Legal Opinion
United States v. Adkinson
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided February 14, 2003No. 391CR03052RVPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT 0. WRIGHT, District Judge,
sitting by designation.
Pending are the motions of William Ad-kinson, Robert Collins, and Daniel Kistler for attorneys’ fees and expenses under the Hyde Amendment. (Docs. 911, 912, and 915.) A hearing was held on Wednesday, October 23, 2002, after which, the parties were directed to file supplemental briefing on various issues and to re-organize the materials related to their Hyde Amendment claims. That briefing having been filed, I am now prepared to address the defendants’ claims.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case has been described as one of the largest and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Manning v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Steven B. AisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Hansen v. Deercreek Plaza, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- United States v. ClaroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.