Legal Opinion

United States v. Claro

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 13, 2009No. 07-20732PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

An indictment against John Anthony Claro, a lawyer, having been dismissed in 2005, and the Government’s having neither appealed that dismissal nor sought to re-indict Claro, he filed a motion for attorney’s fees and litigation expenses, pursuant to the Hyde Amendment, Pub.L. 105-119, § 617, 111 Stat. 2519 (1997), reprinted in 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, Note (providing that prevailing criminal defendants may recover “a reasonable attorney’s fee and other litigation expenses” where the Government’s position was “vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith”). The motion…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Murkeldove v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. Gahagan v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Saldivar v. RodelaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
  4. In Re Energy Partners, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  5. United States v. Juan GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API