Legal Opinion
Manning v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 20, 2007No. 06-7127PublishedCited by 188 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Janet C. Manning appeals the district court’s denial of a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 motion requesting that the court either set aside an administrative offset to an award of attorney’s fees the court made to her under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), or, alternatively, amend the fee order to award the EAJA fees to her counsel. The very narrow issues before us on appeal are (1) whether the EAJA attorney’s fees award should have been paid to Ms. Manning or to her attorney in the first instance and (2) if the fees were properly paid to Ms. Manning, are…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Stephens Ex Rel. RE v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Bryant v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Reeves v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.