State v. Tarlo
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
GUNDRUM, J.
David Tarlo challenges the circuit court's award of restitution to the mother of a victim of child pornography. He argues the court erred in concluding the mother met her burden of proving that the claimed loss was the result of his criminal *336conduct. We agree and reverse the portion of the judgment requiring restitution.
Background
¶ 2. Tarlo was charged with five counts of possession of child pornography in relation to five images found on his computer. According to the criminal complaint, a Wisconsin Department of Justice analyst concluded most of the images were viewed in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- State v. CanadyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- State v. MadlockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. LongmireCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017