State v. Johnson

¶ 1. Edward Johnson contends that the circuit court's order requiring him to pay restitution pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 973.20 (1997-98) 1 should be reversed on several grounds and that the court erred in refusing to permit the discovery he requested. We conclude that the circuit court's restitution order should not be vacated as untimely because there was a valid reason for holding the restitution proceedings outside of the statutory time period and because there was no prejudice to Johnson. We further conclude that the circuit court had authority under § 973.20 to require Johnson to reimburse…