Legal Opinion

Reed v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 18, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Madison District (Jowrt. Action in equity to set aside a tax deed and to quiet title to the land. The plaintiff avers that no notice was given of the expiration of the time of redemption. There was a general denial. Decree was rendered for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Ch. J.

i. tax deed : effect of as evidence:no-deem. The defendant contends in the first place that it does not appear that the plaintiff is in a condition to question his tax title, because he has not shown , that he is the holder of the patent title. The case is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts. From this statement it appears that in 1876 one David Stanton held the equitable title to the land and one Francis Davis held the legffi title: that Stanton and'Davis, • while thus holding title, executed each respectively a deed to the plaintiff. In our opinion this is sufficient.-

"W…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Modern Heat & Power Co. v. Bishop Steamotor Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. Miller v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Young v. CharnquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Herrick v. NieszWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Barcroft v. MannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API