Legal Opinion

Lovejoy v. Gaskill

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 10, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Young, J., without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, J.*

Action of ejectment. The land in controversy is the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section eleven, (11,) township one hundred and twenty, (120,) range twenty-two, (22,) and lot (governmental) one in the same section. Lying west of and adjoining these two subdivisions is lot six, in section ten, (10.) One Hatch was the owner of all this land in 1861, and from him both parties claimed to have derived title to the land in question through mesne conveyances. The rights of the parties depend upon the construction of a deed from Hatch to one Crawford, in 1861, through…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stolp v. ScrimshawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Appeal of O'RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Golden v. Pilchuck Tribe No. 42Washington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API