Legal Opinion

Stolp v. Scrimshaw

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1974No. Nos. 44565, 44575, 44622PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Applications have been duly made by appellants in these and other like cases for “leave to appeal” from decisions of district courts acting in an appellate capacity upon matters initiated and tried in county courts, all as provided by the County Court Act, L. 1971, c. 951, codified as Minn. St. c. 487.

*160The propriety of this court’s discretionary act in granting or denying these applications for leave to appeal, as provided in § 487.39,1 poses important constitutional issues concerning this court’s appellate powers and the legislature’s power to authorize judicial discretion…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Appeal of O'RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Berndt v. BerndtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API