Legal Opinion

Golden v. Pilchuck Tribe No. 42

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1913No. 10438PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, W. P. Bell, J., entered October 20,1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Gose, J.

This is an action to quiet title to two vacant lots in the city of Everett. The plaintiffs were successful in the court below. The defendant has appealed. The case was first heard before Department One, and the judgment was reversed. Golden v. Pilchuck Tribe No. 42, I. O. R. M., 71 Wash. 581, 129 Pac. 93. It was later reheard En Banc.

Both the respondents and the appellant claim title through Charles D. Sweeney. In the month of January, 1896, Sweeney, a single man, conveyed certain property to the re*67spondents by a deed of warranty containing the following description:

“Does…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michon v. AyallaTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Murphy v. Murphy.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Hodges v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Golden v. Pilchuck Tribe No. 42, Improved Order of Red MenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lovejoy v. GaskillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morsbach v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API