Legal Opinion

Cowden's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 10, 1916PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C. J.

The pertinent facts are that the deceased employee, Herbert E. Cowden, was the natural son of a woman who subsequently married a man named Erford A. Cowden. The claimant, Edith M. Cowden, was a daughter of this marriage. Herbert was adopted by Erford A. Cowden according to law, his wife, the mother of Herbert, joining in the petition. The mother predeceased the employee, but the adopting father still is living.

The question to be decided is whether the claimant, Edith M. Cowden, was a dependent of Herbert E. Cowden, the deceased employee, at the time of the latter’s injury, within the meaning…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gould's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Newman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Dodge v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Kelley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Bartoni's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Roney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Boutlier v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API