Legal Opinion

Guttman v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 22, 1961No. 61-C-339PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISHLER, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the defendants, the United States of America and District Director of Internal Revenue for the Brooklyn District, for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., on the grounds (1) that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) plaintiff seeks relief which is barred by Title 28 U.S.C. § 2201, (3) that the United States of America has not consented to the jurisdiction in this proceeding and (4) that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paul Pipola and Julia Pipola v. Mae Chicco and Yorkville Savings and Loan Association, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. David Remis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
  3. Pipola v. ChiccoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. Coson v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  5. Haldeman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bullock v. LathamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Pettengill v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1962
  3. Talbot v. United States Ex Rel. Secretary of the TreasuryDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1994
  4. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. American National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  5. Bullock v. LathamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API