Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Latham

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 20, 1962No. 26703_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

306 F.2d 45

Giles E. BULLOCK and Katherine D. Bullock, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Dana LATHAM, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and E. C. Coyle, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 284.

Docket 26703.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 1, 1962.

Decided July 20, 1962.

Milo Thomas, Rochester, N. Y. (Burton S. Schreiber, Rochester, N. Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellants.

Morton K. Rothschild, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and David O. Walter, Attorneys, Department of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. James R. CosonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Raffaele v. Granger, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. Tomlinson v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  4. Long v. RasmussenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1922
  5. Rothensies v. UllmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Botta v. ScanlonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Gordon v. United States Treasury DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
  3. Bullock v. LathamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Bullock v. LathamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API