Legal Opinion
Pipola v. Chicco
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 5, 1959PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, owners in fee of a one-story residence in the Bronx, New York, bring this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410(a) against the United States of America, to quiet title — specifically to cancel a lien filed by the Government for unpaid taxes assessed against Mae Chic-co, the plaintiffs’ grantor. Also named as defendants are Mae Chicco and the Yorkville Savings and Loan Association, which holds a mortgage upon the premises. The Government, in addition to challenging the plaintiffs’ right to maintain this action, counter-claims for foreclosure of its lien.
It…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dolan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
- Grosvenor v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Progressive Consumers Federal Credit Union v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Quinn v. HookDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- In Re May Reporting Services, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.