Nolan v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARY ANNE RICHEY, District Judge.
Having heard the evidence presented at the judicial review proceeding December 2, 1981, and having considered all memoranda of law, the Court rules as follows:
Jeopardy and termination assessments against plaintiff-taxpayer are found to be reasonable, but the amount of the assessment is found to be inappropriate due to substantial doubts raised by plaintiff in regard to estimated amounts of income. Therefore, the Court remands the complaint to the Secretary of the Treasury for redetermination of the amount of income on which the assessments are based…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Laing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Loretto v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Haskin v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1977
- McAvoy v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1979
- Fidelity Equipment Leasing Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harvey v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
- Granse v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
- Magluta v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Wellek v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.