Legal Opinion
Granse v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1995No. Civ. 3-95-20PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Before the Court is Plaintiff Karl G. Granse’s Complaint to Enjoin Collection or Seizure. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has made a jeopardy assessment 1 against Plaintiff pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6861(a) 2 in the amount of $86,621.00, and levied upon certain property owned by the plaintiff. Both parties have submitted documents for the Court’s review and oral argument was presented to the undersigned on February 24, 1995. The following constitute the Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Koshland v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Commissioner v. EngleSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Loretto v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Friko Corporation, Johnny Daccarett-Ghia, as Alleged Alter Ego or Nominee of Friko Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Varjabedian v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Magluta v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Wellek v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Granse v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Audio Investments v. RobertsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.