Legal Opinion
Magluta v. United States
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 16, 1996No. 96-1668-CIV-MOORE, 96-1669-CIV-MOOREPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OMNIBUS ORDER ON ACTIONS TO ABATE JEOPARDY ASSESSMENT
K. MICHAEL MOORE, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon (1) Plaintiff Salvador Magluta’s Action to Abate Jeopardy Assessment (DE # 1 in Case No. 96-1668-CIV-MOORE); and (2) Plaintiff Augusto Falcon’s Action to Abate Jéopardy Assessment (DE # 1 in Case No. 96-1669-CIV-MOORE).
THE COURT has considered the Complaints, responses, and the pertinent portions of the record. There are two actions presently before the Court. In the earlier-filed action (Case No. 96-1668-CIV-MOORE), the Plaintiff is Salvador Magluta (“Magluta”); in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Precision Air Parts, Inc. v. Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Loretto v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Harvey v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
- Vazquez v. Metropolitan Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Nolan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mary Quinn v. Monroe County, James L. Roberts, County Administrator, Monroe County, individually and in his official capacityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Garwood v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2011
- Wellek v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Guillaume v. CommissionerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- United States v. FergusonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.