Seafeldt v. Port of Astoria
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
This suit was brought by a taxpayer to enjoin the Port of Astoria and its officers from performing a contract which it had entered into with the Tacoma Dredging Company by which it had agreed to do certain dredging work on two bars in the Willamette river, which work that company had agreed to do for the United States of America. The case is here upon an appeal from a decree enjoining the defendants from performing such work.
It appears from the evidence that on December 16, 1931, the Tacoma Dredging Company entered into a contract with the federal government to dredge two bars in the channel…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Minturn v. LarueSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Haesloop v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- City of Corvallis v. CarlileOregon Supreme Court · 1882
- Bliven v. New England Screw Company.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Colwell v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Quackenbush v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Seltenreich v. Town of FairbanksDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
- Walton v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.