Brown v. Dick Smith Nissan, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
Latoya Brown entered a contract to purchase a Mazda 6 automobile from Dick Smith Nissan, Inc. (“Dick Smith”) with the assistance of salesman Robert Hiller. The purchase was contingent on acquiring third-party financing. Due to continuing and unresolved issues with financing, Brown returned the vehicle to Dick Smith. The car was later repossessed and sold by Sovereign Bank with a deficiency against Brown. Brown filed a complaint against Dick Smith and Old Republic Surety Company (“Old Republic”), the surety on Dick Smith’s licensing bond, alleging violations of the South Carolina Dealers Act 1…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Temple v. Tec-Fab, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Fanning v. Fritz's Pontiac-Cadillac-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Adams v. GrantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Taylor v. NixSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gant v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Quidore v. All. Plastics, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020