Legal Opinion

Brown v. Dick Smith Nissan, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 5, 2015No. Appellate Case 2013-000417; 27556PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty

Latoya Brown entered a contract to purchase a Mazda 6 automobile from Dick Smith Nissan, Inc. (“Dick Smith”) with the assistance of salesman Robert Hiller. The purchase was contingent on acquiring third-party financing. Due to continuing and unresolved issues with financing, Brown returned the vehicle to Dick Smith. The car was later repossessed and sold by Sovereign Bank with a deficiency against Brown. Brown filed a complaint against Dick Smith and Old Republic Surety Company (“Old Republic”), the surety on Dick Smith’s licensing bond, alleging violations of the South Carolina Dealers Act 1…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Temple v. Tec-Fab, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Fanning v. Fritz's Pontiac-Cadillac-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Adams v. GrantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Taylor v. NixSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gant v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  2. Quidore v. All. Plastics, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API