Legal Opinion

State v. Griffin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 1915No. 9047PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Before Moore, J., Chester, July, 1914. Motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered , testimony made by Meeks Griffin, Thomas Griffin, John Crosby and JNelson Brice, after conviction for murder.

Read the full summary

Before Moore, J., Chester, July, 1914. Motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered , testimony made by Meeks Griffin, Thomas Griffin, John Crosby and JNelson Brice, after conviction for murder. The facts are stated in the opinion. submits: General Sessions had jurisdiction to grant motion: 80 S. C. 367. Its order is appealable: 40 S. C. 297. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction on appeal to review errors of law: 14 S. C. 423; 51 S. C. 405. Newly discovered testimony sufficient which would probably change result: 67 S. C. 546; 89 S. C. 53. Showing necessary: 33 S. C. 403; 87 S. C.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

This cause has been hither once before. 98 S. C. 105 ; 82 S. E. 254.

After that judgment was pronounced the defendants moved at the July, 1914, term of the Sessions for a nev trial on after discovered evidence.

The Court refused the motion, and this appeal is from that order.

The following is a statement of a present possible procedure in the Sessions Court of the State, as exemplified by this cause.

Homicide 24th April, 1913; trial and conviction of murder July, 1913 ; appeal to this Court, Fall term, 1913 ; judgment affirmed spring,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DeBondt v. Carlton Motorcars, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Miles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. CornSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Estate of Carr Ex Rel. Bolton v. Circle S Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Brown v. Dick Smith Nissan, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API