Legal Opinion

Fanning v. Fritz's Pontiac-Cadillac-Buick, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 10, 1996No. 24443PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waller, Justice:

The sole issue in this class action is whether Fritz Cadillac 1 violated the South Carolina Consumer protection Code (SCCPC), S.C. Code Ann. § 37-1-101 et. seq. (1989), in charging an $87.00 “Procurement Fee” on automobiles purchased between 1983 and 1989. The circuit court found no violation of the SCCPC. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants, the Fannings, purchased a 1989 Fleetwood Cadillac from Fritz in June, 1989. Included in the “Total Cash Price” of the car was an $87.00 “procurement fee.” The record reflects two invoices prepared by Fritz: one specifically enumerates the $87.00…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Jones Leasing, Inc. v. Gene Phillips & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. GamezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Munoz v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Lackey v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Osprey, Inc. v. Cabana Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Carolina Care Plan, Inc. v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Toler's Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. Trident Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API