Legal Opinion

R.R. Comm. v. MacK-hank Petroleum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 3, 1945No. 9469; Motion No. 10139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oil proration case. The suit was by MPCo. (Mackhank Petroleum Company) against the Commission (Railroad Commission of Texas) to set aside an order of the Commission dated March 17, 1944, prorating for the month of April, 1944 (by amendment a like order for May, 1944, was added), the allowable allocated to the New Refugio Field in Refugio County. The proration was upon a per well basis of 57 barrels per day per well, with seven shut down days per month, but allocating to one well (No. 2) of the WRR (W. R. R Oil Co.) 58 barrels per day, and exempting WRR wells 2 and 3 from the shut down order.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Marrs v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Chenoweth v. Nordan & MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Chenoweth v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Sun Oil Co. v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Richard D. Crawford v. XTO Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API