Legal Opinion

Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Railroad Commission

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2007No. 03-0364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Medina

In this case we must decide whether the statute that grants the Railroad Commission authority to regulate production of commingled 1 oil and/or gas deposits includes the authority to regulate drilling, and if so, whether the Railroad Commission may consider the commingled deposits as though they were one reservoir when regulating drilling and production in the commingled field. The court of appeals held that the Railroad Commission could consider the commingled deposits as one reservoir when determining correlative rights and could deny an exception to the well-spacing requirements prescribed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. SHEFFIELD DEVEL. CO. INC. v. City of Glenn HeightsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. City of College Station v. Turtle Rock Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Marrs v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Xog Operating, LLC and Geronimo Holding Corporation v. Chesapeake Exploration Limited Partnership and Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation and Coastal Oil & Gas USA, L.P. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API