Legal Opinion

Sun Oil Co. v. Potter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 26, 1944No. 9448PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, chief justice.

Rule 37 case. The appeal is from a final judgment refusing to set aside a permit to drill two wells upon an 8.97-acre tract in the East Texas Oil Field in addition to the two producing wells already on the tract. The wells here involved are the same as those in Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Potter, Tex.Civ.App., 143 S.W.2d 135, wherein the then authorizing permits were set aside on the ground that each permit was granted upon a separate voluntary subdivision of the 8.97-acre tract; whereas the right of the tract as a whole furnished the proper basis for determining the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Marrs v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Missouri-Kansas & T. R. of Texas v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Potter v. Sun Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. R.R. Comm. v. MacK-hank PetroleumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1998
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API