Hodgson v. Hart
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The court did not err in directing the jury to return a verdict finding the property subject. The verdict was demanded by the evidence. Mrs. Hodgson, the claimant, relied upon a title predicated on the fact that on September 14, 1912, Asbury Hodgson, having previously made a deed to the land in dispute to C. N. Hodgson, defendant in fi. fa., for some reason satisfactory to himself conveyed to the claimant, Mrs. Hodgson, property of the value of $6250, consisting of stocks, etc., and in turn had the claimant transfer this property to C. N. Hodgson, who then…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morris v. Georgia Loan, Savings & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Pursley v. StahleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Kent & Co. v. PlumbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
3Cited by7 opinions
- Keenan v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Beaudry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- American Surety Co. v. Peoples BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Witcher v. JSD PROPERTIES, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cincinnati Insurance Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.