Cripe Et Ux v. Coates Et Ux
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAchor, J.
This is an action brought by appellant for the purpose of having a contract for the exchange of real estate reformed to express the alleged agreement of the parties and for specific performance. The court sustained appellees’ demurrer thereto. Appellants refused to plead further and judgment was accordingly entered for appellees. The error assigned is the sustaining of said demurrer. The memorandum to the demurrer contained the following ground:
*248“No. 1. That the agreement relied upon in plaintiff’s third amended complaint, and upon which this action is based is . . . not enforcible because of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matney v. OdomTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Michelson v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Ames v. AmesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kruse, Kruse & Miklosko, Inc. v. BeedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rentenbach Engineering Co., Construction Division v. General Realty Ltd.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Ligon Specialized Hauler, Inc. v. HottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Schuler v. GrafIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- William J. Knapp and Rosalea M. Knapp v. The Estate of Carl R. Wright and Joan M. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.