Legal Opinion

Wilmington Trust Company v. Barry

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 12, 1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’HARA, Judge.

Plaintiff sues for conversion of a sum of money allegedly obtained by means of unauthorized endorsements of checks issued to the order of Sidney Scott and/or Jane M. Scott. The plaintiff, the alleged as-signee of the claims of the Scotts, not being able to obtain service of process upon defendant Barry in the State of Delaware, caused a writ of foreign attachment to issue, pursuant to 10 Del.C. § 3506, for purposes of seizing all interest of defendant Barry in the proceeds of a health insurance policy issued to Josiah Marvel Scott, son of the aforesaid Sidney and Jane M.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Bantum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Canaday v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  4. Jansen v. TylerOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. JosselynMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Wilmington Trust Co. v. BarrySuperior Court of Delaware · 1979
  3. In Re Estate of KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Stephen Gunderson v. The Trade Desk, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
  5. Stephen Gunderson v. The Trade Desk, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API