Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Pegas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Claimant resigned from his job as a machinist because he felt threatened by a co-worker with whom he previously had a confrontation. The Board found that claimant left his job for personal and noncompelling reasons and disqualified him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Upon reviewing the record, we find that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.

The employer’s personnel director, Frank Santoro, testified that claimant engaged in a verbal altercation with a co-worker after the co-worker told claimant that he was not doing his work properly. Santoro stated that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re the Claim of DiolosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. in re the Claim of ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of De WittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API