Legal Opinion
Hayday v. Hammermill Paper Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1931No. 28,371PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant appeals from the judgment. There Avas an order denying its motion in the alternative for a reduction of the verdict or a neAV trial.
This is a second appeal herein. Hayday v. Hammermill Paper Co. 176 Minn. 315, 223 N. W. 614, 63 A. L. R. 210. Some questions were so disposed of by the former decision that they do not again arise. The action is to recover damages for breach of a contract to buy 20,000 cords of pulpwood. There was a delivery and acceptance of 17,000 cords, in round numbers, when defendant refused to receive more unless the wood Avas all spruce. The contract was in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Sternbergh v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Fullam v. Wright & Colton Wire Cloth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Bentley v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- McGrath v. CannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Trust Under Will of KoffendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- City of South St. Paul v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Floyd v. Ring Const. Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
- McPeak v. BokerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Freeman v. SoukupNevada Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.