Legal Opinion
Floyd v. Ring Const. Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 8, 1948No. 13585PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
The parties to this proceeding agree that the ultimate question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff-appellant’s demand for a jury trial. The purpose of the action is to recover upon a written contract compensation for expert services. The complaint was filed February 2, 1945, the answer on February 16, 1945, and the demand for a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, on February 19, 1945. Thereupon the action was designated upon the docket as a jury action.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wehrman v. ConklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- W. R. Grimshaw Company and National Surety Corporation v. Nevil C. Withrow Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Tallackson Potato Co., Inc. v. MTK Potato Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Metcalf v. Security International Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Eastmount Construction Company and American Surety Company v. Transport Manufacturing & Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.