Legal Opinion

Curry v. Planning Zoning Commission

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 10, 1977No. File No. 100687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On September 15, 1975, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Guilford (hereinafter referred to as the commission), acting under the provisions of § 8-23 of the General Statutes, adopted an amendment1 to its comprehensive plan of development, effective September 30, 1975. The plaintiffs allege that they are aggrieved by the open space amendment for the reasons that (1) section 12-107e of the General Statutes is vague and therefore violative of the state and federal constitutions; (2) the open space amendment violates the equal protection clause "in that it confers a benefit on some…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guinn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Schlesinger v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. First Hartford Realty Corp. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. PremoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gayle v. Young, No. Spbr 9409-27973 (Mar. 27, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  2. Kelley Prop. Devel. v. Lebanon Plan. Zon., No. 51 28 08 (Jan. 14, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
  3. Scarano v. Zoning Board of Appeals, No. Cv89-0233435 (Mar. 21, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API