Legal Opinion
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2003No. Nos. 01-35028, 01-35845PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TROTT; Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part by Judge TASHIMA.
TROTT, Circuit Judge.
The Skokomish Indian Tribe (“Skokomish Tribe”) and individual tribe members (collectively “Tribe”) brought this action against the City of Tacoma (“City”), Tacoma Public Utilities (“TPU”), and individual board members of TPU (“Board”), (collectively “Tacoma”), and the United States alleging they were harmed by the Cush-man Hydroelectric Project (“Project”) owned by the City.1 The Project includes two dams, two reservoirs, diversion works, two power houses, transmission lines, and it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Eric D. Oliver v. Jerry Keller, Sheriff Kyle Edwards Dave SwiekertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- CITY OF TACOMA, WA v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Plys v. Ang (In re Ang)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Otwell v. Alabama Power Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.