Trifari, Krussman & Fishel, Inc. v. Charel Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BICKS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, owner of a copyright in an article of costume jewelry, moves for a preliminary injunction to restrain an alleged infringement thereof. Plagiarism as well as validity of the copyright are stoutly denied. The grounds of invalidity alleged are threefold, viz.: ineligibility of costume jewelry generally for copyright protection, lack of originality and inadequacy of notice of the copyright.
Characterizing plaintiff’s product disparagingly as “junk jewelry” defendant urges that it does not rise to the dignity of a “work of art.” In defining the scope of the term…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Baker v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Barry Kieselstein-Cord v. Accessories by Pearl, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Acadia CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- PPS, Inc. v. Jewelry Sales Representatives, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Trifari, Krussman & Fishel, Inc. v. B. Steinberg-Kaslo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Prestige Floral v. California Artificial Flower Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.