Legal Opinion
Prestige Floral v. California Artificial Flower Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 5, 1962PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, District Judge.
This is a motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff Prestige Floral, Societe Anonyme, (“Prestige”) filed its-complaint on June 22, 1961, alleging- copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 101 and seeking a permanent injunction, damages, and other relief. Jurisdiction is vested in this Court by 17 U.S.C. § 112 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338. The article allegedly infringed is a molded polyethylene flower in the form of a Charles lilac. 1
Defendant California Artificial Flower Company (Inc.) (“California”) is a Rhode Island corporation and defendant Calart (Inc.) is a New…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- National Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Thomas Wilson & Company, Inc. v. Irving J. Dorfman Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Gardenia Flowers, Inc. v. Joseph Markovits, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Angelo R. Puddu and Puddu & Martinelli, Inc. v. Buonamici Statuary, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Davis v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Marvin Worth Productions v. Superior Films Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.