Legal Opinion

Schorck v. Epperson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1955No. 2674PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Justice.

The plaintiffs in this case alleged substantially as follows: They are the owners and occupants of lot 3, block 8, of the Union Pacific Railroad Addition in the town of Rock River, which faces D Avenue; that defendants are the owners of lots 1 and 2, block 8, which are contiguous to lots 3 on the east; that defendants without any consent of the plaintiffs on November 15, 1953, and on succeeding days constructed a slab board fence approximately 9 feet high and 106 feet long and about the full length of lot 3; that prior to the construction of said fence, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burke v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Barger v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Erickson v. HudsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Cohen Et Ux. v. Perrino Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Dahl v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bowers Welding and Hotshot, Inc. v. BromleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hein v. LeeWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bowers Welding and Hotshot, Inc. v. BromleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API