Schorck v. Epperson
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Blume, Justice.
The plaintiffs in this case alleged substantially as follows: They are the owners and occupants of lot 3, block 8, of the Union Pacific Railroad Addition in the town of Rock River, which faces D Avenue; that defendants are the owners of lots 1 and 2, block 8, which are contiguous to lots 3 on the east; that defendants without any consent of the plaintiffs on November 15, 1953, and on succeeding days constructed a slab board fence approximately 9 feet high and 106 feet long and about the full length of lot 3; that prior to the construction of said fence, plaintiffs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burke v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Barger v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Erickson v. HudsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- Cohen Et Ux. v. Perrino Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Dahl v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bowers Welding and Hotshot, Inc. v. BromleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Hein v. LeeWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Bowers Welding and Hotshot, Inc. v. BromleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982