Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Utah Oil Refining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1927No. 4478PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

This is an action for damages to real property on account of an alleged nuisance. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for $500, from which defendant has appealed. The case went to the jury upon the issue of whether the plaintiff’s dwelling house had been rendered uncomfortable and undesirable for residence purposes and its value thereby depreciated, in consequence of gases, odors, and fumes being carried to and discharged thereon, from an oil refining plant operated by defendant.

There are numerous alleged errors occurring during the trial which the appellant has assigned and argued, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. McCarty v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Cumberland Corp. v. MetropoulosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Strachan v. Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Millett v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Purcell v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Wasatch Oil Refining Co. v. Wade, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Waier v. Peerless Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Husband v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Cannon v. NeubergerUtah Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API