Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Idaho Falls Latter Day Saints Hospital

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1965No. 9456PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Justice.

In 1956 Tad Schofield, plaintiff-appellant herein, sustained an injury to his left eye which caused his vision to become cloudy. He was referred to Dr. Wallber, a defendant-respondent herein, a physician and surgeon specializing in ophthalmology. Dr. Wallber, after examining the eye and having X-rays taken, determined that a traumatic cataract was forming on Schofield’s left eye. Dr. Wallber advised that the cataract be allowed to mature to permit corrective surgery.

Schofield visited Dr. Wallber on January 8, 1959, in regard to the proposed operation and was informed he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Cavero v. Franklin General Benevolent SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Walker v. DistlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hale v. HeningerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. LePelley v. GrefensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Flowerdew v. WarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Maxwell v. Women's Clinic, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Stundon v. StadnikWyoming Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API