Legal Opinion

Stundon v. Stadnik

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1970No. 3730PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McEWAN

Plaintiff was operated upon twice- by the defendant for the removal of cataractous lenses from his eyes. During the second operation on January 8, 1962, which concerned the left eye, some fluid vitreous was lost from the eye. Some months following the second operation, plaintiff suffered a detached retina and subsequently lost vision in the left eye. 1 The left eye was removed January 16, 1967. 2 Plaintiff filed suit September 16, 1966, and the cause was tried before a jury on May 6, 1968. At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was granted, and plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Woods v. BrumlopNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harris v. GrizzleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hook Ex Rel. Estate of Summers v. RothsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Roybal v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Boxberger v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API