Legal Opinion

Youngquist v. American Railway Express Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1926No. File No. 5686PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, C.

This is an action to recover damages which plaintiffs allege that they suffered from the publication by the defendant corporation of a certain telegram alleged to have been false and libelous. The defendant in its answer pleads both a plea in abatement and a plea in bar.

The plea in abatement alleges that plaintiffs are copartners doing business under a fictitious name, and that said copartnership has not complied with the requirements of the statutes, requiring the publication and filing of a certificate showing the true names of the persons constituting the firm; and defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Melcher v. BeelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Muetze v. TuteurWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Durand v. PrestonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Winget v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caruso v. Local Union No. 690 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API