Youngquist v. American Railway Express Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORIARTY, C.
This is an action to recover damages which plaintiffs allege that they suffered from the publication by the defendant corporation of a certain telegram alleged to have been false and libelous. The defendant in its answer pleads both a plea in abatement and a plea in bar.
The plea in abatement alleges that plaintiffs are copartners doing business under a fictitious name, and that said copartnership has not complied with the requirements of the statutes, requiring the publication and filing of a certificate showing the true names of the persons constituting the firm; and defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wood v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Melcher v. BeelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Muetze v. TuteurWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Durand v. PrestonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Winget v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Caruso v. Local Union No. 690 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982