Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue, State of Florida, a State Agency and Randy Miller, Its Executive Director v. Trailer Train Company, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 2, 1987No. 87-3093PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROPST, District Judge:

This is an interlocutory appeal, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), from a judgment of the district court granting Trailer Train Company’s (Trailer Train) motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff-Appellee Trailer Train brought this action pursuant to the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (4 R. Act) (§ 306), seeking a judgment against Defendants-Appellants Department of Revenue, State of Florida and Randy Miller, its executive director (collectively, Department), declaring that the Department’s proposed tax assessment of Trailer…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Arizona Public Service Co. v. SneadSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Trailer Train Company, a Corporation and Railbox Company, a Corporation v. State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Clinchfield Railroad Company v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Trailer Train Company Railbox Company and Railgon Company v. Donald S. Leuenberger, Tax Commissioner of the State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. Chrysler Rail Transportation Corp. v. HoltDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
  4. Acf Industries, Inc. v. Department Of Revenue Of The State Of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. ACF Industries, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API