Arizona Public Service Co. v. Snead
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
New Mexico has imposed a tax on the privilege of generating electricity within its borders. The question in this case is whether that tax conflicts with federal law, statutory or constitutional.
I
The Four Corners power plants, located in New Mexico’s desert northwest, are owned by the appellants, five public utilities companies.1 Most of the electricity generated at the plants is ultimately sold to out-of-state consumers.2 New *143Mexico imposes a 4% gross receipts tax on retail sellers of electricity,3 but since the bulk of the appellants' sales are made to consumers in other States, they do not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. Director of Taxation of HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Lloyd Eugene ButcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Duquesne Light Co. v. State Tax Dept.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- The Kansas City Southern Railway Co., Cross v. Shirley McNamara Secretary of the Dept. Of Revenue and Taxation, State of Louisiana, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.