Legal Opinion

KORTLANDER v. Cornell

District Court, D. Montana

Decided September 12, 2011No. CV 10-155-BLG-RFCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

RICHARD F. CEBULL, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Christopher Kortlander, and his businesses Historical Rarities, Inc. and Custer Battlefield Museum, Inc., have brought this Bivens action for deprivation of constitutional rights secured by the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The claims arise out of an investigation during the years 2003-09 by law enforcement agents of the Department of the Interior related to the sale of fraudulent historical…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kortlander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. 49Hopkins, LLC v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. Morozko v. Shoshone County, IdahoDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API