Hines v. Darling
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was brought under 3 How. Stat. *49§ 1403, to recover a penalty for willfully obstructing a certain ditch laid along the public highway in front of defendant’s premises. The action was commenced in justice’s court, and appealed to the circuit, where the plaintiff had verdict and judgment for the penalty of $25 provided by the statute. The ditch had been dug about 13 or 14 years. It was admitted that the defendant obstructed it in two places, and, being ordered by the highway commissioner to remove the obstructions, he refused to do so. The defense was that the ditch was not lawfully…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Highway Commissioners v. ElyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Bresnahan v. NugentMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- McDaniel v. Gate City Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States ex rel. Pressprich & Son Co. v. ElwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Von Essen v. VosMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Mullen v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Carmichael v. Schaefer Heights Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Fink v. Superior Lamp & Shade Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927