Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Robison

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1911No. 1403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by Joe F. Robison, guardian of Oscar Sampson, a minor, against J. S. Mullen and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The first assignment of error is that the district court of Carter county was without jurisdiction to heal' and determine the case, by reason of the passage of the Act of June 4, 1908. This question has been squarely passed upon by this court in Adair et al. v. McFarlin, 28 Okla. 633, 115 Pac. 787, in which the act in question was held to be prospective, and not retrospective, in its operation; and that its passage did not divest the district court of jurisdiction in civil causes, then pending therein, involving in excess of $200, and not exceeding $500. Rudolph v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terrapin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Adair v. McFarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Ferguson v. Union Nat. Bank of Columbus, OhioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Grant v. LawrenceUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Franklin v. HaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. IngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Barnes v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Finch v. American State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Fitch v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API