Legal Opinion

State ex rel. American Legion Post 25 v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2008No. 2006-2263PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzingek, J.

{¶ 1} This discretionary appeal presents the question of whether R.C. 4112.04(B), the Ohio Civil Rights Commission’s subpoena statute, creates a duty for the commission to issue subpoenas at the request of a party charged with a discriminatory practice at any stage of its administrative proceedings. We hold that the clear language of the statute mandates the commission to issue subpoenas at the party’s request.

I. Case Background

{¶ 2} Carol Van Slyke filed a complaint with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission against her former employer, the American Legion Post 25 (“the Legion”), claiming that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Harris v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Carroll v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Dreamer v. MasonOhio Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Roush v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Hunter v. BrittenOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. Finley, C-061052 (9-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Grybosky v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm'nOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API