Legal Opinion
St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Mirage Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 8, 2006No. CIV.A. 05-273-JJFPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Individual Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss For Improper Venue (D.I. 15) and Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, To Stay (D.I. 19). For the reasons discussed, the Motions will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1989, the inventors of the patents-in-suit were employed by Mirage Systems, Inc. 1 (“Mirage”) in California. In 1990, the inventors filed a patent application for their initial invention with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). The first patent issued in 1992. Applications for five related…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Leonardo Martino and Trans One Ii, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Terra Nova Insurance Company, Ltd. v. 900 Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.