Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Bevington Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

The‘ Bevington Savings Bank was a banking corporation, organized under the laws of Iowa, and located at Bevington. Financial embarrassment overtook the institution, and the state banking department ordered an assessment on the stock of the concern, to restore impaired capital, on or about December 31-, 1921.' Such action-was taken.under and 'by virtue of Section 1878-of the 1897 Code, which reads:

“Should the capital stock of any state ’or savings bank become impaired by losses or otherwise, the auditor of state .[after-wards by amendment made the superintendent of banking] may require an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Kent v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Andrew v. Farmers Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Heuser v. SharmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  5. Leach v. Arthur Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. AthertonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Raton Natural Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Andrew v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Hodgell v. WildeWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bates v. Clarion Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API