Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Farmers Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 10, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

This appeal presents but one question for decision: Is a stockholder of a bank who, in response to a resolution by its board of directors, has paid a 50-per-cent assessment, prior to the closing of the.bank, in order to make good the impairment of its capital, entitled to a credit therefor on a 100-per-cent assessment subsequently sought to be levied by the receiver of the bank in conformity to statutory provisions? The question must be answered in the light of the record facts and the interpretation to be given to the language of the statute. The statutory provision reads:

“All stockholders…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Delano v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Duke v. ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Northwestern Trust Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Blackert v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Heine v. DegenIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Andrews v. State Ex Rel. BlairOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Andrew v. Bevington Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Andrew v. Peoples State Bank of HumboldtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Andrew v. Commercial State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API