Legal Opinion

Kinchlow v. Midland Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1896No. 8951PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Wyandotte Court of Common Pleas. Hon. T. P. Anderson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

On January 5, 1892, the plaintiff, a boy 10 years of age, was scalded and badly injured by falling into a barrel partly full of hot water formed by the exhaust steam from the engine used as a motive power for the defendant’s elevator at Kansas City, Kansas. On January 18, 1892, he commenced his action to recover damages in the sum of $15,000 on account of said injury. The defenses were a general denial and a plea of contributory negligence, which latter was put in issue by the reply of the plaintiff. The case was called for trial on June 14,1892, and the plaintiff introduced his evidence, to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Birge v. GardinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
  5. Bransom's adm'r v. LabrotCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Edgington ex rel. Meyer v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Biggs v. Consolidated Barb-Wire Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Brinilson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API