Legal Opinion
Gadow v. Parker
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided January 5, 2005No. 228,2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice.
The defendants-below, who are the Department of Health and Social Services of the State of Delaware (“DHSS”) and Diane Gadow (“Gadow”), appeal from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court denying their motion to dismiss the complaint on limitations grounds. DHSS and Gadow argued to that Court that the action brought by the plaintiff, Joyce Parker (“Parker”), was time-barred. The Superi- or Court denied the dismissal motion, ruling that the defendants had waived the statute of limitations defense by failing to raise it during the proceedings' on Parker’s motion to amend…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Precision Air, Inc. v. Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- City of Wilmington v. SpencerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Dollard v. CallerySuperior Court of Delaware · 2018
- Parker v. GadowSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Stayton v. CLARIANT CORP.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Verrastro v. Bayhealth Medical Center, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.