Legal Opinion

Parker v. Gadow

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 24, 2006No. 408,2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice.

The plaintiff-below, Joyce Parker (“Parker”), appeals from a final judgment of the Superior Court that granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss her complaint, based on the running of the two-year statute of limitations. According to Parker, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 amended 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and now provides for a four-year statute of limitations. As a result, Parker contends that the Superior Court improperly dismissed her complaint as time-barred because that four-year statute of limitations should apply to this proceeding. 1

The Superior Court determined that, since…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. Connelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  3. Riley v. Delaware River and Bay AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2006
  4. First State Towing, LLC and Katharine E. Morris v. Div. of State Police, Dep't of Safety and Homeland Sec., State of DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  5. First State Towing, LLC and Katharine E. Morris v. Div. of State Police, Dep't of Safety and Homeland Sec., State of DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API